Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com

Wellness Pro Electrotherapy System

Go to the Home PageHistory of ElectrotherapyResearch Articles & Scientific / Clinical StudiesDownloadsFrequently Asked QuestionsTestimonialsContact Us / Customer ServiceOrdering Information

Wellness Pro

Seal of Safety - Wellness Pro Electrotherapy System Pro

Wellness Pro Electrotherapy SystemSeal of Approval - Wellness Pro Electrotherapy System

Seal of Approval - Wellness Pro Electrotherapy System

Pain Reduction

Data collection study, Microcurrent Therapy Lynn A. Wallace, PT (1990)

  • 94% of the 1531 patients experienced a reduction in pain during the first treatment.
  • No side effects or increase in symptoms were reported. The overall results were remarkably similar when comparing the first 200 / 400 and 800 cases to the final total of 1531 cases.
  • Pain reduction occurring after the patient left the clinic was not recorded as pain reduction during treatment.
  • Patients who discontinued their treatments after significant progress (i.e. pain decrease from 10 to 3) but, before reaching a pain free state, were recorded as failures.
  • Similarly, patients whose treatment was discontinued by their physician before reaching a pain free state were recorded as failures.
  • 96% response in pain relief.
  • 88% pain free within 10 treatments.
  • 12 types of acute injuries tested, average pain free = 4 treatments.
  • Acute radiating cervical pain, average pain free = 3.5 treatments.
  • Acute lower back pain, average pain free = 4.5 treatments

The following list of criteria was followed:

  • Patients were asked to rate their pain on a subjective pain scale (0 to 10, with 10 being unbearable pain).
  • Decreases in pain that were achieved after patients left the clinic were not included.
  • Biphasic current was used almost exclusively (negative current was used on selected cases with referred spinal pain).
  • Electrode probes and pads were used.
  • Daily treatment was encouraged, therefore, the total treatments rendered represent approximately that many days of treatment.
  • Medication was not altered.
  • No other modalities (heat, ice, electricity, or mechanical traction) were used.
  • Instructions such as positioning and avoidance were presented during the first treatment.

Worker's Compensation Injuries Study (283 patients)

  • Control group on conventional therapy (hot, cold packs, massage) avg. # of treatments for back to work =20.7
  • Microcurrent only: avg. # of treatments for back to work =8.7
  • Microcurrent and conventional therapy: avg. # of treatments back to work =8.6

Result: 237 % accelerated healing response 

Contact us for more information and to order your own Wellness Pro Electrotherapy machine - or click here to order now!

Home | History of Electrotherapy | Research & Scientific/Clinical Studies | Testimonials
Blog | Downloads | Frequently Asked Questions | Contact Us | Ordering Information | Links

Call us for more information or to order now: 1-888-831-8280
All Content Copyright © 2007 Electromedical Technologies